Friday, March 30, 2012

Argento's Alluring Ambience


Argento has no interest in realism whatsoever; Suspiria is self-consciously stylized, and artificial. Suspiria is about intense color as much as it is about anything. Maitland McDonagh describes Argento’s colors as “aggressively unnatural, perhaps like stained glass—saturated yellow and deep cobalt blue—perhaps artificially limpid, glittering plane turquoise and green. And always red, rich and clear” (McDonagh). Argento’s phantasmagoria goes for the exact opposite of the usual vivid and colorful film, disrupting every inch of the way and graphically visualizing the bodily violence and dismemberment, like a Grimm fairytale...it is not “kool-aidesque”. 
This film is based around gothic spaces, childhood fantasies of something horrific “out there” in the dark come true, such as a room may be inexplicably full of sharp wire coils, a bat may suddenly attack, and maggots may drop from the ceiling into your hair as if to suggest a state of rotting within the house. There are themes of instability and disorientation within the lusciousness and beauty of Argento's destabilized world. Throughout the film we are held captive(well I really was) by every image—whether the drive from the airport, a walk up or down the gilded school staircase, or a subjective traveling shot through the red corridor of the dance school. The audience experiences these aesthetically beautiful images more than the narrative itself. McDonagh explains such criticisms: “Even allowing for the degree to which narrative is made deliberately subordinate to  mise-en-scene, it must be conceded that Argento can be a sloppy writer” (McDonagh). Each room of the school is highly ornamental, as are the film's other gothic locales, such as the irises by Madame Blanc's desk, and the geometric stained glass windows. Many frames have a painterly composition, with characters positioned in doorways or mirror frames that set them apart graphically from other characters. Indeed, spatial aesthetics connects to story when the key to the narrative mystery turns out to be a reference to design and color, such as the iris. 

The various murder scenes functions in two crucial ways: thematically and stylistic. This early double-murder sequence is typical for the film, in that our attention is drawn to graphics, such as the squares of the grid Pat is stabbed against. Here and everywhere in the set decorations we see these shapes, especially the first murder. In this first murder, the geometric orders of angles with the random formlessness of bloodstains resemble nothing more than an expressionist painter's messy, colorful pallet. 
Even through Argento creates a beautiful environment surrounding these brutal murders, he “murders and main and splatters blood with abstract abandon” in a “hedonist” way (McDonagh). This creation may be a reason why this film is a favorite with many people, particularly women…we are all enthralled with the mise-en-scene. In the words of McDonagh: “The imagery is bizarre, almost surreal…” (McDonagh). Personally, I dislike slasher films especially scenes of brutal murder/gore involving a woman. Why would we watch and enjoy voyeuristically viewing something like that? Now that can be a never-ending debate that may never be answered. All I know is that “the world of Dario Argento is one of twisted logic, rhapsodic violence, [and] stylized excess…” (McDonagh).

4 comments:

  1. This violence, this terror from his movies, where does it come from? Is it even appropriate to ask an author or director why? I mean who knows? There appears to be an interest in Eros and Thanatos, otherwise known as love and death. I bet the most delicate part of the film is the sound mixing. Music, voices, powerful sounds, man, I can’t imagine all the editing that must have gone into this. His vocation is to terrorize people, but it’s also a personal and cultural talent I think or archetypes we share. That’s my psychology intuition. ALSO your blog is very pretty with photos. Go you :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Argento definitely put the majority of his focus on the beauty of colors especially in places where bright and abstract colors are inappropriate. You are right in regards to the delicate appearance of all the murders as if they were displayed in a museum gallery; magnificent attractive deaths triumph over gory disgusting ones, and that is what most likely allures such vast audience despite the genre not being close to popular at the time of the films release. People love to look at beautiful things. Even if those things are dead people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with your point that we are held captive by this destabilized world that Argento has created.There are scenes where we as the audience are just waiting for something to happen we are captivated and paranoid that something bad its going to happen. However when you think something will happen nothing ever does. Using this technique keeps you drawn in and entertained because you cannot guess whats happening in the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like the idea of captivity 'in a destabilized world.' This is a really good discussion and also a nice review/analysis. It's an odd statement about women liking this movie because we're enthralled by the mis en scene though. Are you suggesting what because women like decorative stuff and this movie is lavishly decorative, that the spectacle of a young woman being violently and sadistically murdered just seems another level of decoration to us? You may be right, and it's an intriguing and disturbing thought that most people wouldn't venture. We're also supposed to be the empathic ones who don't find the spectacle of victimization at all fun. I suppose both is possible, depending on how it's done? Anyway, I'd like to see you play with this more.

    ReplyDelete