Daughters
of the Dust at first caught me off guard. I was annoyed that most of the
movie, I did not understood what any of the women and men were saying. Without
knowing what the characters were saying, I did not know the plot. Yes, I
understood that these women were going to the Americas, learning about the
modern times, and having conflicts with new ideas such as religion…that was
basically it. It wasn’t until I read the reading that I began to understand the
context of the narrative, and the reasoning behind this film. This is a film
about family, and passes the Bechdel Test: 1. It has to have at least two
[named] women in it, 2. Who talk to each other, 3. About something besides a
man.
In addition, this film is not the ordinary mainstream film, it breaks a
lot of barriers. First, it has “intentionally broken with mainstream filmmaking approaches that too
often reduce the complexities of black life to homogenized, ready-made film
commodities...” (Everett). Second, “Her goal was to tell a story as an African
griot would, with an unfolding, like women’s weaving” (Everett). Third, it is
not plot driven, but “heavily influenced by foreign films…” (Everett). Fourth
(and fifth), she experimented with film speeds and speculative fiction. This
film isn’t supposed to be easy for the audience to watch, because it is not the
norm…especially if the audience member is white. Dash desires to “rewrite
cinematic images of black women and break completely with traditional film
stereotypes” (Everett). We are watching these women through a different lens,
not an urban setting with gangs, poverty, etc. or a civil war/slavery in
America context. We are like the character Trula. Dash says, “Trula was the
vehicle used to represent the audience. This is why she does not speak. She is
like the audience—she does not understand the dialect [nor] the religion” (Everett).
We don’t understand this film because it breaks away from the usual film portrayal
of African Americans.
Daughters of the
Dust is a “more accurate representation of African disaporic cultural
traditions”, filled with Gullah dialect which “reflects the dislocated Africans’
retention of remnants of their language” (which we have to really listen while
watching), and the influence of African American jazz/blues on the visual
aesthetic (Everett). What we see and experience in this film is ancestry/roots.
Dash describes this film as “a film that was like a heirloom itself… I wanted
to create these tableaux images like frescos in your mind…” (Everett). I hope the next time I watch a film like this,
I do not get frustrated at the abnormality, but embrace it, because Dash really
reveals a whole new outlook on African American women.
Good for you for diving right in to the larger themes, and for using your own puzzlement as an analytical tool. To be fair though, the sound quality of this particular DVD is terrible, and I really need to get a better copy. There's enough to deal with in this film without struggling with basically hearing what people are saying too. It wasn't just you.
ReplyDelete